|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NJ Bill Allowing 'Clone and Kill' Fetal Farms Remains on Fast Track for Passage Gruesome Bill Encourages Body Part Harvesting from Cloned Babies. Legal experts agree that Summary: Status: Background: Does somatic cell nuclear transplantation constitute cloning of a human being? According to a July 2002 report by the President's Council on Bioethics, ". . whatever the reason for producing it - the initial product of somatic cell nuclear transfer is a living (one-celled) cloned human embryo. The immediate intention of transferring the nucleus is precisely to produce just such an entity; one that is alive (rather than nonliving), one that is human (rather than nonhuman or animal), and one that is an embryo, an entity capable only of replication into an articulated organismic whole (rather than just a somatic cell capable only or replication into more of the same cell type). This is the intended primary product of performing somatic cell nuclear transfer, whether the ultimate motive or purpose is producing a live-born child from the cloned embryo or conducting scientific research on the cloned embryo. Also, the blastocyst stage that develops from this one-celled cloned embryo will be the same being, whether it is then transferred to a woman's uterus to begin a pregnancy or is used as a source of stem cells for research and possible therapy for others." What the Legislation Means
The bill purports to prohibit the cloning of a human being and provides that a person who knowingly engages or assists, directly or indirectly, in the cloning of a human being is guilty of a crime of the first degree. However, the bill defines the "cloning of a human being" to mean the replication of a human individual by cultivating a cell with genetic material through the egg, embryo, fetal and newborn stages into a new human individual." Unlike federal versions of "clone and kill" legislation, S1909 do not specifically ban the implantation of the cloned human embryo into the uterus of a woman. Since the bill defines a cloned human being at the newborn stage, which means after birth, it would allow a cloned living human being to be implanted into a uterus at the embryonic stage and harvested for research and killed at any time from the embryonic period through the ninth month of pregnancy. The bill would actually mandate that an abortion be performed because the prohibited conduct draws the line only at the newborn stages - i.e., after birth. It would make criminals out of women, researchers, doctors, or any "person who knowingly engages or assists, directly or indirectly" in allowing the cloned human child to be born. Legal Experts Agree that this Legislation will Lead to the Birth of Human Clones During the December 16th Senate voting session, many Republican Senators made the assertion that this legislation is nothing new because this research is already being conducted in NJ. It is important to note that although some research may be conducted with private funds, this legislation is new for the following reasons: For the first time in the state of NJ, couples undergoing fertility treatments will be able to donate their human embryonic children for lethal scientific experimentation. In addition, it will establish in law that an individual human being does not exist until the newborn stage. It will allow the creation of cloned human beings to be implanted into a uterus at the embryonic stage and grown up until the ninth month of gestation for the express purpose of destroying them to harvest their organs and cells. It would require partial birth abortions and other types of abortions up to the ninth month of pregnancy because the prohibited conduct says you can't bring the cloned child to term and draws the line at the newborn stage. Furthermore, legal experts agree that the legislation would not prevent a woman from choosing to give birth to a cloned baby, the legislations is unenforceable under current federal and New Jersey case law. To see how your Senators voted. Action: Message for your two assembly members: Links: Legal experts agree that New Jersey would become first state to have human clones born The Presidents Council on Bioethics- Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry President Bush's Bioethics Adviser Criticizes Stanford Cloning Plan Poll: Americans Opposed to Cloning By Any Name, Human Cloning Is Planned at Stanford Stanford's Plan a Violation of Ethics, Says Biogenetics Pioneer New York Times Seriously Questions Therapeutic Human Cloning Connecting the Dots: Sanctity of life threatened on many fronts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||